Is there a zip-like function that pads to longest length?

Is there a built-in function that works like zip() but that will pad the results so that the length of the resultant list is the length of the longest input rather than the shortest input?

>>> a = ['a1']
>>> b = ['b1', 'b2', 'b3']
>>> c = ['c1', 'c2']

>>> zip(a, b, c)
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1')]

>>> What command goes here?
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), (None, 'b2', 'c2'), (None, 'b3', None)]

Answers:

Thank you for visiting the Q&A section on Magenaut. Please note that all the answers may not help you solve the issue immediately. So please treat them as advisements. If you found the post helpful (or not), leave a comment & I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.

Method 1

In Python 3 you can use itertools.zip_longest

>>> list(itertools.zip_longest(a, b, c))
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), (None, 'b2', 'c2'), (None, 'b3', None)]

You can pad with a different value than None by using the fillvalue parameter:

>>> list(itertools.zip_longest(a, b, c, fillvalue='foo'))
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), ('foo', 'b2', 'c2'), ('foo', 'b3', 'foo')]

With Python 2 you can either use itertools.izip_longest (Python 2.6+), or you can use map with None. It is a little known feature of map (but map changed in Python 3.x, so this only works in Python 2.x).

>>> map(None, a, b, c)
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), (None, 'b2', 'c2'), (None, 'b3', None)]

Method 2

For Python 2.6x use itertools module’s izip_longest.

For Python 3 use zip_longest instead (no leading i).

>>> list(itertools.izip_longest(a, b, c))
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), (None, 'b2', 'c2'), (None, 'b3', None)]

Method 3

non itertools Python 3 solution:

def zip_longest(*lists):
    def g(l):
        for item in l:
            yield item
        while True:
            yield None
    gens = [g(l) for l in lists]    
    for _ in range(max(map(len, lists))):
        yield tuple(next(g) for g in gens)

Method 4

In addition to the accepted answer, if you’re working with iterables that might be different lengths but shouldn’t be, it’s recommended to pass strict=True to zip() (supported since Python 3.10).

To quote the documentation:

zip() is often used in cases where the iterables are assumed to be of
equal length. In such cases, it’s recommended to use the strict=True
option. Its output is the same as regular zip():

>>> list(zip(('a', 'b', 'c'), (1, 2, 3), strict=True))
[('a', 1), ('b', 2), ('c', 3)]

Unlike the default behavior, it checks that the
lengths of iterables are identical, raising a ValueError if they
aren’t:

>>> list(zip(range(3), ['fee', 'fi', 'fo', 'fum'], strict=True))
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: zip() argument 2 is longer than argument 1

Without the strict=True argument, any bug
that results in iterables of different lengths will be silenced,
possibly manifesting as a hard-to-find bug in another part of the
program.

Method 5

non itertools My Python 2 solution:

if len(list1) < len(list2):
    list1.extend([None] * (len(list2) - len(list1)))
else:
    list2.extend([None] * (len(list1) - len(list2)))

Method 6

To add to the answers already given, the following works for any iterable and does not use itertools, answering @ProdIssue’s question:

def zip_longest(*iterables, default_value):
    iterators = tuple(iter(i) for i in iterables)
    sentinel = object()
    while True:
        new = tuple(next(i, sentinel) for i in iterators)
        if all(n is sentinel for n in new):
            return
        yield tuple(default_value if n is sentinel else n for n in new)

The use of sentinel is needed so an iterator yielding default_value will not be erroneously be identified as empty.

Method 7

Im using a 2d array but the concept is the similar using python 2.x:

if len(set([len(p) for p in printer])) > 1:
    printer = [column+['']*(max([len(p) for p in printer])-len(column)) for column in printer]


All methods was sourced from stackoverflow.com or stackexchange.com, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5, cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x