Pandas merge two dataframes with different columns

I’m surely missing something simple here. Trying to merge two dataframes in pandas that have mostly the same column names, but the right dataframe has some columns that the left doesn’t have, and vice versa.

>df_may

  id  quantity  attr_1  attr_2
0  1        20       0       1
1  2        23       1       1
2  3        19       1       1
3  4        19       0       0

>df_jun

  id  quantity  attr_1  attr_3
0  5         8       1       0
1  6        13       0       1
2  7        20       1       1
3  8        25       1       1

I’ve tried joining with an outer join:

mayjundf = pd.DataFrame.merge(df_may, df_jun, how="outer")

But that yields:

Left data columns not unique: Index([....

I’ve also specified a single column to join on (on = "id", e.g.), but that duplicates all columns except id like attr_1_x, attr_1_y, which is not ideal. I’ve also passed the entire list of columns (there are many) to on:

mayjundf = pd.DataFrame.merge(df_may, df_jun, how="outer", on=list(df_may.columns.values))

Which yields:

ValueError: Buffer has wrong number of dimensions (expected 1, got 2)

What am I missing? I’d like to get a df with all rows appended, and attr_1, attr_2, attr_3 populated where possible, NaN where they don’t show up. This seems like a pretty typical workflow for data munging, but I’m stuck.

Thanks in advance.

Answers:

Thank you for visiting the Q&A section on Magenaut. Please note that all the answers may not help you solve the issue immediately. So please treat them as advisements. If you found the post helpful (or not), leave a comment & I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.

Method 1

I think in this case concat is what you want:

In [12]:

pd.concat([df,df1], axis=0, ignore_index=True)
Out[12]:
   attr_1  attr_2  attr_3  id  quantity
0       0       1     NaN   1        20
1       1       1     NaN   2        23
2       1       1     NaN   3        19
3       0       0     NaN   4        19
4       1     NaN       0   5         8
5       0     NaN       1   6        13
6       1     NaN       1   7        20
7       1     NaN       1   8        25

by passing axis=0 here you are stacking the df’s on top of each other which I believe is what you want then producing NaN value where they are absent from their respective dfs.

Method 2

The accepted answer will break if there are duplicate headers:

InvalidIndexError: Reindexing only valid with uniquely valued Index objects.

For example, here A has 3x trial columns, which prevents concat:

A = pd.DataFrame([[3, 1, 4, 1]], columns=['id', 'trial', 'trial', 'trial'])
#    id  trial  trial  trial
# 0   3      1      4      1

B = pd.DataFrame([[5, 9], [2, 6]], columns=['id', 'trial'])
#    id  trial
# 0   5      9
# 1   2      6

pd.concat([A, B], ignore_index=True)
# InvalidIndexError: Reindexing only valid with uniquely valued Index objects

To fix this, deduplicate the column names before concat:

parser = pd.io.parsers.base_parser.ParserBase({'usecols': None})

for df in [A, B]:
    df.columns = parser._maybe_dedup_names(df.columns) 

pd.concat([A, B], ignore_index=True)
#    id  trial  trial.1  trial.2
# 0   3      1        4        1
# 1   5      9      NaN      NaN
# 2   2      6      NaN      NaN

Or as a one-liner but less readable:

pd.concat([df.set_axis(parser._maybe_dedup_names(df.columns), axis=1) for df in [A, B]], ignore_index=True)

Note that for pandas <1.3.0, use: parser = pd.io.parsers.ParserBase({})

Method 3

I had this problem today using any of concat, append or merge, and I got around it by adding a helper column sequentially numbered and then doing an outer join

helper=1
for i in df1.index:
    df1.loc[i,'helper']=helper
    helper=helper+1
for i in df2.index:
    df2.loc[i,'helper']=helper
    helper=helper+1
df1.merge(df2,on='helper',how='outer')


All methods was sourced from stackoverflow.com or stackexchange.com, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5, cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x