Python Pandas Conditional Sum with Groupby

Using sample data:

df = pd.DataFrame({'key1' : ['a','a','b','b','a'],
               'key2' : ['one', 'two', 'one', 'two', 'one'],
               'data1' : np.random.randn(5),
               'data2' : np. random.randn(5)})

df

    data1        data2     key1  key2
0    0.361601    0.375297    a   one
1    0.069889    0.809772    a   two
2    1.468194    0.272929    b   one
3   -1.138458    0.865060    b   two
4   -0.268210    1.250340    a   one

I’m trying to figure out how to group the data by key1 and sum only the data1 values where key2 equals ‘one’.

Here’s what I’ve tried

def f(d,a,b):
    d.ix[d[a] == b, 'data1'].sum()

df.groupby(['key1']).apply(f, a = 'key2', b = 'one').reset_index()

But this gives me a dataframe with ‘None’ values

index   key1    0
0       a       None
1       b       None

Any ideas here? I’m looking for the Pandas equivalent of the following SQL:

SELECT Key1, SUM(CASE WHEN Key2 = 'one' then data1 else 0 end)
FROM df
GROUP BY key1

FYI – I’ve seen conditional sums for pandas aggregate but couldn’t transform the answer provided there to work with sums rather than counts.

Thanks in advance

Answers:

Thank you for visiting the Q&A section on Magenaut. Please note that all the answers may not help you solve the issue immediately. So please treat them as advisements. If you found the post helpful (or not), leave a comment & I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.

Method 1

First groupby the key1 column:

In [11]: g = df.groupby('key1')

and then for each group take the subDataFrame where key2 equals ‘one’ and sum the data1 column:

In [12]: g.apply(lambda x: x[x['key2'] == 'one']['data1'].sum())
Out[12]:
key1
a       0.093391
b       1.468194
dtype: float64

To explain what’s going on let’s look at the ‘a’ group:

In [21]: a = g.get_group('a')

In [22]: a
Out[22]:
      data1     data2 key1 key2
0  0.361601  0.375297    a  one
1  0.069889  0.809772    a  two
4 -0.268210  1.250340    a  one

In [23]: a[a['key2'] == 'one']
Out[23]:
      data1     data2 key1 key2
0  0.361601  0.375297    a  one
4 -0.268210  1.250340    a  one

In [24]: a[a['key2'] == 'one']['data1']
Out[24]:
0    0.361601
4   -0.268210
Name: data1, dtype: float64

In [25]: a[a['key2'] == 'one']['data1'].sum()
Out[25]: 0.093391000000000002

It may be slightly easier/clearer to do this by restricting the dataframe to just those with key2 equals one first:

In [31]: df1 = df[df['key2'] == 'one']

In [32]: df1
Out[32]:
      data1     data2 key1 key2
0  0.361601  0.375297    a  one
2  1.468194  0.272929    b  one
4 -0.268210  1.250340    a  one

In [33]: df1.groupby('key1')['data1'].sum()
Out[33]:
key1
a       0.093391
b       1.468194
Name: data1, dtype: float64

Method 2

I think that today with pandas 0.23 you can do this:

import numpy as np

 df.assign(result = np.where(df['key2']=='one',df.data1,0))
   .groupby('key1').agg({'result':sum})

The advantage of this is that you can apply it to more than one column of the same dataframe

df.assign(
 result1 = np.where(df['key2']=='one',df.data1,0),
 result2 = np.where(df['key2']=='two',df.data1,0)
  ).groupby('key1').agg({'result1':sum, 'result2':sum})

Method 3

You can filter your dataframe before you perform your groupby operation. If this reduces your series index due to all values being out-of-scope, you can use reindex with fillna:

res = df.loc[df['key2'].eq('one')]
        .groupby('key1')['data1'].sum()
        .reindex(df['key1'].unique()).fillna(0)

print(res)

key1
a    3.631610
b    0.978738
c    0.000000
Name: data1, dtype: float64

Setup

I have added an additional row for demonstration purposes.

np.random.seed(0)

df = pd.DataFrame({'key1': ['a','a','b','b','a','c'],
                   'key2': ['one', 'two', 'one', 'two', 'one', 'two'],
                   'data1': np.random.randn(6),
                   'data2': np.random.randn(6)})


All methods was sourced from stackoverflow.com or stackexchange.com, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5, cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x