time.time vs. timeit.timeit
Sometimes, I like to time how long it takes parts of my code to run. I’ve checked a lot of online sites and have seen, at large, two main ways to do this. One is using time.time and the other is using timeit.timeit.
Sometimes, I like to time how long it takes parts of my code to run. I’ve checked a lot of online sites and have seen, at large, two main ways to do this. One is using time.time and the other is using timeit.timeit.
We have a need to create SQLAlchemy classes to access multiple external data sources that will increase in number over time. We use the declarative base for our core ORM models and I know we can manually specify new ORM classes using the autoload=True to auto generate the mapping.
I have a model similar to the following:
I have a weird problem, I want to add a global query using context processors.
This is how I did it by following:
I’d like to create a function that takes a (sorted) list as its argument and outputs a list containing each element’s corresponding percentile.
Is there a way to ensure all created subprocess are dead at exit time of a Python program? By subprocess I mean those created with subprocess.Popen().
TL/DR:
I am working with pandas dataframes that are essentially time series like this:
I have an index array (x) of dates (datetime objects) and an array of actual values (y: bond prices). Doing (in iPython):
I have the following, very basic code that throws; TypeError: the JSON object must be str, not 'bytes'