Is there a reference somewhere defining precisely when enclosing tuples with parentheses is or is not required?
Here is an example that surprised me recently:
>>> d = {}
>>> d[0,] = 'potato'
>>> if 0, in d:
File "<stdin>", line 1
if 0, in d:
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Answers:
Thank you for visiting the Q&A section on Magenaut. Please note that all the answers may not help you solve the issue immediately. So please treat them as advisements. If you found the post helpful (or not), leave a comment & I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
Method 1
The combining of expressions to create a tuple using the comma token is termed an expression_list. The rules of operator precedence do not cover expression lists; this is because expression lists are not themselves expressions; they become expressions when enclosed in parentheses.
So, an unenclosed expression_list is allowed anywhere in Python that it is specifically allowed by the language grammar, but not where an expression as such is required.
For example, the grammar of the if statement is as follows:
if_stmt ::= "if" expression ":" suite
( "elif" expression ":" suite )*
["else" ":" suite]
Because the production expression is referenced, unenclosed expression_lists are not allowed as the subject of the if statement. However, the for statement accepts an expression_list:
for_stmt ::= "for" target_list "in" expression_list ":" suite
["else" ":" suite]
So the following is allowed:
for x in 1, 2, 3:
print(x)
Method 2
Anywhere you are allowed to use the expression_list term, you do not need to use parenthesis.
The if statement requires an expression, and does not support an expression_list.
Examples of syntax that does allow expression_list:
- The
returnstatement yieldexpressions- assignment
(including augmented assignment) - The
forstatement.
Grepping the Expressions, Simple and Compound statements documentation for expression_list will tell you all locations that expression_list is used in the Python grammar.
Method 3
Parentheses are also required when you want to avoid ambiguity.
The following are two different expressions… just because something is an ‘expression list’, doesn’t result in the expression list you might expect 🙂
(1, 2, 3) + (4, 5) # results in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) because + does sequence.extend on the tuples 1, 2, 3 + 4, 5 # this results in (1, 2, 7, 5) because + adds the elements, since there were no parentheses to protect the separate tuples
All methods was sourced from stackoverflow.com or stackexchange.com, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5, cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0