For example, this is the first line of my /etc/fstab:
UUID=050e1e34-39e6-4072-a03e-ae0bf90ba13a / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1
And here’s the output of df -h command (reporting free disk space):
<a href="https://getridbug.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cca4a3a2a9b58caeb9a2a2b5">[email protected]</a>:~$ df -T Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/vda ext4 30832636 4884200 24359188 17% / none tmpfs 4 0 4 0% /sys/fs/cgroup udev devtmpfs 498172 12 498160 1% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 101796 320 101476 1% /run none tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock none tmpfs 508972 0 508972 0% /run/shm none tmpfs 102400 0 102400 0% /run/user
-
From the two is it okay to deduce that
UUID=050e1e34-39e6-4072-a03e-ae0bf90ba13arepresents/dev/vdagiven that the first column infstabis<file system>? -
So, would it be okay if I modified
/etc/fstabto this?/dev/vda / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1
-
EDIT: If yes (to above question), why does the
sudo blkidcommand show a different UUID for/dev/vda?$ sudo blkid /dev/vda: LABEL="DOROOT" UUID="6f469437-4935-44c5-8ac6-53eb54a9af26" TYPE="ext4"
What am I missing here?
Answer: I’d conclude (3) to be a bug in the cloud of my host. So yes, the UUID reported by
blkid(orls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid) should be the same as the one used in/etc/fstab.
Answers:
Thank you for visiting the Q&A section on Magenaut. Please note that all the answers may not help you solve the issue immediately. So please treat them as advisements. If you found the post helpful (or not), leave a comment & I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
Method 1
The advantage of using the UUID is that it is independent from the actual device number the operating system gives your hard disk.
Imagine you add another hard disk to the system, and for some reason the OS decides that your old disk is now sdb instead of sda.
Your boot process would be screwed up if fstab points to the device name. But in case of the UUIDs, it is fine.
More detailed information about UUIDs can also be found on the blog post “UUIDs and Linux: Everything you ever need to know”
Method 2
In that case, can I modify /etc/fstab to this?
You can and it will probably be okay, but most likely it would be better to leave the UUID.
UUIDs are arbitrary strings used to identify, in this case, a partition on a block device; its stored with the partition itself, and can be assigned a different one if desired (sort of like MAC addresses).
The advantage of using the UUID is that it is unmistakable, whereas /dev/vda is not; it could happen that it ends up being a different drive at boot time, although this may be totally theoretical in context (e.g., because you only have one drive of a particular type).
Another more subtle example of where using the device name can cause a problem would be the recent switch on some systems to using consistent network device names. If this occurred as an upgrade and you used a hardcoded device name in a network script somewhere, it would break. A parallel example WRT block devices might be a kernel or udev upgrade which changes the naming scheme.
One point of UUIDs is to make these kind of things possible and painless. So while you can use the device name, there is no advantage to doing so unless (e.g.) you have a system where you swap different drives in. In other words, if you don’t have a good reason to do that, stick with the UUID.
Method 3
You can do man fstab for a fairly concise read on the contents and semantics of the /etc/fstab file. On my x86, fairly up-to-date Arch linux server, man fstab gives me this:
The second field ... describes the mount point for the filesystem.
So, yes, /dev/vda apparently is one of many names for some device, as is UUID=050e1e34-39e6-4072-a03e-ae0bf90ba13a, given that both names appear to mount on “/”.
If you look in the directory /dev/disk/by-uuid/ you can see symbolic links that point to things like /dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1 on my server. This might be another way to check your hypothesis. /dev/disk has subdirectories by-id, by-path, by-uuid which all appear to be alternate names for the same device.
All methods was sourced from stackoverflow.com or stackexchange.com, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5, cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0