Global resource vs. Local resource in ASP.NET

We use resx files to localize our web applications. We usually create local resx files (that map to a specific page) when only one page uses a certain phrase, and a global resx file when more than one page needs the phrase.
But the good thing about global resx files is that they are a class, and you can call the phrases like you call properties of a class:

Resource.UI.iNotFound

So I was thinking – why have local resx files at all? why not use one global resx file for the whole application, and that way avoid runtime errors from calling non-existent phrases?

I’m sure there’s a good answer for that, I just don’t know what it is….

Answers:

Thank you for visiting the Q&A section on Magenaut. Please note that all the answers may not help you solve the issue immediately. So please treat them as advisements. If you found the post helpful (or not), leave a comment & I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.

Method 1

I kept on looking for guidelines, and found this in MSDN:

Choosing Between Global and Local Resource Files

You can use any combination of global
and local resource files in the Web
application. Generally, you add
resources to a global resource file
when you want to share the resources
between pages. Resources in global
resource files are also strongly typed
for when you want to access the files
programmatically.

However, global resource files can
become large, if you store all
localized resources in them. Global
resource files can also be more
difficult to manage, if more than one
developer is working on different
pages but in a single resource file.

Local resource files make it easier to
manage resources for a single ASP.NET
Web page. But you cannot share
resources between pages. Additionally,
you might create lots of local
resource files, if you have many pages
that must be localized into many
languages. If sites are large with
many folders and languages, local
resources can quickly expand the
number of assemblies in the
application domain.

When you make a change to a default resource file,
either local or global, ASP.NET
recompiles the resources and restarts
the ASP.NET application. This can
affect the overall performance of your
site. If you add satellite resource
files, it does not cause a
recompilation of resources, but the
ASP.NET application will restart.

So it seems that it’s really up to the programming team to weigh the pros and cons of each method and choose what’s good for them.

Method 2

Joe90 – I have to say that in my experience, I can’t agree that managing lots of local resource files scattered throughout your whole project is easier than managing one, global resource file. There is nothing to stop repetition of the same translations again and again and they are very difficult to track down. Access to the Global resource file is very easy to co-ordinate within a team and multiple users can see at a glance whether their required translation has already been done.

I started off with exactly the same policy as Lea – i.e. start with a local resource file and then move this to a global resource file if it was referenced more than once. This soon became loads of hassle to manage and I’ve since moved to using global resource files every time now.

There don’t seem to be any clear guidelines by Microsoft as to what the best practice is, or even, how the two methods are implemented so that we can hazard a guess!

I’m guessing the comparison/payoff is that local resource files only require a recompile of the file they relate to, whereas changing a global resource file seems to require a recompile of the whole web site – with an inherent loss of session state etc. so requires taking the site offline during the update to be safe.

Method 3

I have a development team of at least 10 developers on a single product and we are using one global resx for each site.

The problem with merging this big resx file should in my opinion not be a problem.

If you have 10 developers who themselves set the language on the site, how do you get a uniform way to express themselves on the site? Developers often tend to be good at code and not the grammatical expression. (I am a developer myself.)

A language expert should edit resx file and lock it for the developers!

Method 4

A Global Resource file is the best method for translation. The key is use a naming convention, like page name abbreviations for the first few letters of a string name so that you can locate resources per web page basis easily. Trying to reuse many phrases across multiple pages will cause more confusion for the translators.

You can define resuable phrases as much or as little as you want, like Yes, No, BTN_OK, BTN_Cancel, QTN_AreYouSure, etc by using a lack of page naming convention (no page name abbreviations for the first few letters). The majority of your lines of RESX will be specific to each page and you should not focus on trying to reuse as much as possible. Changing one phrase across the entire file can be carefully done in minutes using text find/replace when needed.


All methods was sourced from stackoverflow.com or stackexchange.com, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5, cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x