Is there any significant difference between
pip install -e /path/to/mypackage
and the setuptools variant?
python /path/to/mypackage/setup.py develop
Answers:
Thank you for visiting the Q&A section on Magenaut. Please note that all the answers may not help you solve the issue immediately. So please treat them as advisements. If you found the post helpful (or not), leave a comment & I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
Method 1
Try to avoid calling setup.py directly, it will not properly tell pip that you’ve installed your package.
With pip install -e:
For local projects, the “SomeProject.egg-info” directory is created
relative to the project path. This is one advantage over just using
setup.py develop, which creates the “egg-info” directly relative the
current working directory.
More: docs
Also read the setuptools’ docs.
Method 2
One more difference: pip install -e uses wheel while
python setup.py develop
doesn’t use it.
With install, you could achieve the same behavior by using
pip install -e /path/to/package --no-use-wheel
More info on wheels : python wheels
Method 3
Another difference that may favor pip install -e is that if your project has dependencies in install_requires in setup.py, then pip install -e . installs dependencies with pip, while python setup.py develop can install with easy_install, and may cause problems re: ‘egg-info’ as mentioned above. When install-requires uses dependency_links with custom git URLs, with attached egg identifiers, this can be especially annoying.
Method 4
Yet another difference: when you run python setup.py develop for a version that is considered a pre-release (perhaps because you’re running it from a git clone when not having checked out a release), then you will enable installation of pre-releases of your dependencies. On the other hand, with pip install --editable you would have to pass --pre explicitly if you want these pre-releases.
(See the CI log with pre-releases accidentally used and compare that to a fixed build here.)
All methods was sourced from stackoverflow.com or stackexchange.com, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5, cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0