Why “numpy.any” has no short-circuit mechanism?
I don’t understand why a so basic optimization has not yet be done:
I don’t understand why a so basic optimization has not yet be done:
I am still new to Python, and I have been trying to improve the performance of my Python script, so I tested it with and without global variables. I timed it, and to my surprise, it ran faster with global variables declared rather than passing local vars to functions. What’s going on? I thought execution speed was faster with local variables? (I know globals are not safe, I am still curious.)
I am trying to calculate a distance matrix for a long list of locations identified by Latitude & Longitude using the Haversine formula that takes two tuples of coordinate pairs to produce the distance:
I ran simple python script on Raspberry Pi 3. This script is responsible to open video device and stream data (800×600) to HTTP endpoint using MJPEG. When I receive this stream one of my Raspberry Pi cores works on 100%. It possible to run OpenCV with multi threading?
In Python generally, membership of a hashable collection is best tested via set. We know this because the use of hashing gives us O(1) lookup complexity versus O(n) for list or np.ndarray.
I have a function defined by a combination of basic math functions (abs, cosh, sinh, exp, …).
I am baffled by this
What is the best way to create a new empty list in Python?
(This question is about how to make multiprocessing.Pool() run code faster. I finally solved it, and the final solution can be found at the bottom of the post.)
How does the Requests library compare with the PyCurl performance wise?