If you are in a controller context, you can access the current authenticated User. Take an article such as Get the current user, within an ApiController action, without passing the userID as a parameter .
As the title says, I wonder, why ASP.NET Identity 2.0 uses a string with a GUID as primary clustered key for the user table. Does this have any advantages to an integer id? I see only the problem, that a GUID isn’t the best choice for a clustered index.
I’m trying to customise ASP.NET Identity 3 so that it uses integer keys:
ASP.NET authentication is now based on OWIN middleware that can be used on any OWIN-based host. ASP.NET Identity does not have any dependency on System.Web.
I’m currently working on implementing the new ASP.NET MVC 5 out-of-the box authentication into my application. However when using Unity as my IoC, I cannot use any portion of the AccountController because I’m given the error:
When I use IdentityUser model in Asp.Net Identity with EntityFramework, it creates some standard fields in the database. All the fields are self explanatory except for the below two fields.
I am trying to redirect user to page based on their role,
Is there a way to revoke for example an email conformation token generated by an usermanager in ASP NET Identity 2.0?
I’m trying something quite exotic I believe and I’m facing a few problems, which I hope can be solved with the help of the users here on StackOverflow.
We have 2 applications that are both using Asp.Net Identity for security.