Can we use Response.Flush () instead of Response.End()
Response.End() generates ThreadAbortException.
Response.End() generates ThreadAbortException.
I use a System.Timers.Timer in my Asp.Net application and I need to use the HttpServerUtility.MapPath method which seems to be only available via HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath.
The problem is that HttpContext.Current is null when the Timer.Elapsed event fires.
Lets say I am setting a value on the http context in my middleware. For example HttpContext.User.
I am doing some asynchronous work on a separate thread using:
I am wanting to use ImageResizer (from ImageResizing dot net). I installed ImageResizer for MVC via NuGet. But when I go to use the following code from the example:
We have a multi-layered Asp.NET Web Forms application. The data layer has a class called DataAccess which impements IDisposable and has an instance of our Entity Framework Object Context as a private field. The class has a number of public methods returning various collections of Entities and will dispose its Object Context when it is disposed.
My goal is to have one data context (MainDbContext) per HTTP request in ASP.NET MVC and dispose the data context when the request ends.
I’m using a “Post” async method of webApi rest service:
I’m troubleshooting a caching issue on a set of secured pages and have realized that the Header needs to be modified for all Responses. As I put together a solution, I want to know the difference between HttpContext.Current.Response and Page.Response and when each object should be used in an app.
Is there room for issue in the following code in terms of multiple users of the same web application? I mean, I know that a purely static string will be shared across all sessions for a single ASP.NET application, but given that this explicitly refers to the Current.Session, even though it is static it seems like it would always refer to the session instance of the “current user.”