Why does concatenation of DataFrames get exponentially slower?
I have a function which processes a DataFrame, largely to process data into buckets create a binary matrix of features in a particular column using pd.get_dummies(df[col]).
I have a function which processes a DataFrame, largely to process data into buckets create a binary matrix of features in a particular column using pd.get_dummies(df[col]).
It is my understanding that the range() function, which is actually an object type in Python 3, generates its contents on the fly, similar to a generator.
Gives most details.
I have two lists:
In terms of performance in Python, is a list-comprehension, or functions like map(), filter() and reduce() faster than a for loop? Why, technically, they run in a C speed, while the for loop runs in the python virtual machine speed?.
I want to perform my own complex operations on financial data in dataframes in a sequential manner.
I have about 10million values that I need to put in some type of look up table, so I was wondering which would be more efficient a list or dict?
Some opcodes tend to come in pairs thus making it possible to
predict the second code when the first is run. For example,
GET_ITER is often followed by FOR_ITER. And FOR_ITER is often
followed by STORE_FAST or UNPACK_SEQUENCE.
How to replace values in a Pandas series s via a dictionary d has been asked and re-asked many times.
Recently began branching out from my safe place (R) into Python and and am a bit confused by the cell localization/selection in Pandas. I’ve read the documentation but I’m struggling to understand the practical implications of the various localization/selection options.