Process substitution not allowed by Python’s subprocess with shell=True?
Here is a toy example of process substitution that works fine in Bash:
process-substitution
What is the portable (POSIX) way to achieve process substitution?
Some shells, like bash, support Process Substitution which is a way to present process output as a file, like this:
Why does process substitution result in a file called /dev/fd/63 which is a pipe?
I am trying to understand named pipes in the context of this particular example.
Performance differences between pipelines and process substitution
I tend to use pipelines in my bash scripts over process substitution in most situations, especially in cases of using multiple sets of commands as it seems more readable to do ... | ... | ... over ... < <(... < <(...)).
How do I use tee to redirect to grep
I don’t have much experience of using tee, so I hope this is not very basic.
How process substitution is implemented in bash?
I was researching the other question, when I realized I don’t understand what’s happening under the hood, what are those /dev/fd/* files and how come child processes can open them.
Split an input for different command and combine the result
I know how to combine the result of different command
Process substitution and cat: can’t read stdin
The process substitution <(cat) doesn’t work. Why?
grep files from list
I am trying to run grep against a list of a few hundred files:
bash: how to propagate errors in process substitution?
I want my shell scripts to fail whenever a command executed with them fails.