Conceptual difference between Linux and (Free)BSD Kernel
(I’ve already noticed that this question was asked before but I think it has not been answered in a way I’d like to understand the topic.)
(I’ve already noticed that this question was asked before but I think it has not been answered in a way I’d like to understand the topic.)
I heard that FIFOs are named pipes. And they have exactly the same semantics. On the other hand, I think Unix domain socket is quite similar to pipe (although I’ve never made use of it). So I wonder if they all refer to the same implementation in Linux kernel. Any idea?
I’ve started installing Debian testing on amd64 and I’ve come to a screen asking me to install a kernel. It gives me a choice between linux-image-3.16-2-amd64, linux-image-amd64, and none.
I started thinking about this issue in the context of etiquette on the Linux Kernel Mailing list. As the world’s best known and arguably most successful and important free software project, the Linux kernel gets plenty of press. And the project founder and leader, Linus Torvalds, clearly needs no introduction here.
I had troubles with the screen brightness control in my laptop and I fixed it by adding the acpi_osi=linux and acpi_backlight=vendorparameters to the filegrub.cfg.
I’d like to know what these parameters mean and why they work.
I would like to know the exact position of the following device in the packet flow for ingress traffic shaping:
cp a b and cat a > b, what’s the difference?
My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-privileged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.
When I type the command service vboxdrv setup in my CentOS 7 terminal, I get the following error:
I administer a Gentoo Hardened box that uses file capabilities to eliminate most of the need for setuid-root binaries (e.g. /bin/ping has CAP_NET_RAW, etc).